Why does a captive change how a CEO handles risk management?

Owning the risk pulls the chief executive into the operational detail

Queen's argument is about attention, not about money directly. Once a company carries a meaningful retention, a claim is a cheque the owner writes, so the chief executive starts spending time on the mundane operational detail that actually produces claims. He says captives create the best risk management possible for that reason, and works it through with a claims study from his own MGA.

The mechanism Queen describes is simple. A captive behaves like a large self insured retention, and once the retention is meaningful the loss is felt by the owner rather than absorbed by a carrier. That, he says, is when a chief executive starts taking time over things that would otherwise slip their mind and are not the kinds of things chief executives typically worry about.

Key takeaways

01

Queen treats a captive as a large self insured retention, and says the retention is what makes an owner attend to operational detail.

02

His MGA's own claims work traced a seasonal concentration of severe claims back to pressure wounds following ordinary illness.

03

The practical consequence is that a measure CMS already tracks becomes a claims control once the company carries the loss itself.

His example comes from his own book. Studying claims at his MGA, his team found a seasonal concentration, and behind it a concentration in sepsis and wrongful death. In their world those are frequently downstream of a pressure wound.

The plaintiff's framing, he says, is that a nursing home put profits over patients and did not staff or reposition adequately. The data pointed somewhere else: a significant share of those pressure wounds followed an ordinary illness, because a frail resident who gets sick loses the reserves the skin needs to repair itself.

That reframes vaccination from a nice to have into a claims control. Queen notes CMS already monitors nursing home vaccination rates. His question is who inside the operator actually acts on it, and his answer is that a carrier discussing underwriting credit rarely moves anyone, while an owner facing the cost of the claim does.

How it happens

From retention to attention

  1. 01The company takes a meaningful retention, so a claim is money it pays rather than money a carrier pays.
  2. 02Claims data is examined for cause rather than filed, because the cause is now the owner's problem.
  3. 03The root cause turns out to be operational and unglamorous.
  4. 04Management attaches real consequences to the operational measure, which is what changes the claim count.

From the conversation

Matt Queen
Captive Insurance Attorney, author of Modern Captive Insurance

Consequently, you'll see the CEO taking much more time on things that honestly will slip their mind and just are not the kinds of things CEOs typically worry about.

This answer begins at 8:09 of the full conversation. Watch or listen to the whole thing.

Citations

Sources

  1. CMS, Nursing Home Care Compare quality measureshttps://www.cms.gov/medicare/quality/nursing-home-improvement/care-compare

The views expressed are those of the featured guest, drawn from a recorded conversation, and reflect their own professional experience. Nothing on this page is insurance, tax, legal, or investment advice. Consult your own advisors about your specific situation.

Corrections or removal requests: contact@captiveip.com

Claims & resilience